<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Student Renters Discriminated</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bostonrealestateobserver.com/boston-student-renters-discriminated/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bostonrealestateobserver.com/boston-student-renters-discriminated/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 00:20:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: BUstudent</title>
		<link>http://bostonrealestateobserver.com/boston-student-renters-discriminated/#comment-571</link>
		<dc:creator>BUstudent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bostonrealestateobserver.com/?p=2731#comment-571</guid>
		<description>I disagree with Alan. Sexual orientation is a choice. Does that mean if a landlord choses not to rent to homosexuals is that not discrimination? Political party affiliation is also a choice. Can one chose to only rent to Republicans and not Democrats? I am sure there are countless more examples to why choice has nothing to do with this.
Seems to me that Alan&#039;s argument is the one that is pretty silly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree with Alan. Sexual orientation is a choice. Does that mean if a landlord choses not to rent to homosexuals is that not discrimination? Political party affiliation is also a choice. Can one chose to only rent to Republicans and not Democrats? I am sure there are countless more examples to why choice has nothing to do with this.<br />
Seems to me that Alan&#8217;s argument is the one that is pretty silly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Miegel</title>
		<link>http://bostonrealestateobserver.com/boston-student-renters-discriminated/#comment-566</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Miegel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bostonrealestateobserver.com/?p=2731#comment-566</guid>
		<description>To call it &quot;discriminating&quot; to not allow renters based on student status or pets is not appropriate when both are choices the individual makes. One doesn&#039;t choose one&#039;s own race, gender, or age and those should be never be the basis for hiring. However, owning a pet or being a student are both choices the individual makes and for you to write a blog post about how these are some sort of underprivalaged class is pretty silly and will only seek to annoy the various landlords or infuriate any students that may read this. Come on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To call it &#8220;discriminating&#8221; to not allow renters based on student status or pets is not appropriate when both are choices the individual makes. One doesn&#8217;t choose one&#8217;s own race, gender, or age and those should be never be the basis for hiring. However, owning a pet or being a student are both choices the individual makes and for you to write a blog post about how these are some sort of underprivalaged class is pretty silly and will only seek to annoy the various landlords or infuriate any students that may read this. Come on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

